[agents] CfP: Special track: Use of qualitative data in social simulation @ Social Simulation Conference 2021

[Melania Borit]

***Apologies for cross-posting.***

Dear colleagues,

If you are working with qualitative data and social simulation, please consider submitting your research (poster, extended abstract, full paper) to the special track “Using qualitative data to inform behavioural rules in social simulation”, which is described below the signature and is to be organized during the Social Simulation Conference 2021<https://ssc2021.uek.krakow.pl/>, 20-24.09, Cracow, Poland (or online, if necessary).

Important dates: https://ssc2021.uek.krakow.pl/call-for-submissions/.

Registration: https://ssc2021.uek.krakow.pl/registration/

All the best,

Melania and Bruce.
_______

Melania Borit, Ph.D.

Associate professor,
Leader Research Group CRAFT<https://uit.no/research/craft> – Knowledge Integration and Blue Futures

Norwegian College of Fishery Science,
Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics,
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (University of Tromsø),
Tromsø, Norway.

E-mail: melania.borit at uit.no<mailto:melania.borit at uit.no>
Web: uit.no/melania.borit<http://uit.no/ansatte/organisasjon/ansatte/person?p_document_id=139029&p_dimension_id=88166>

_____

Title of the special track: Using qualitative data to inform behavioral rules

Organised: ESSA<http://www.essa.eu.org/> Special Interest Group Qual2Rule<http://cfpm.org/qual2rule/essa-sig/>

Session chairs:
Melania Borit, CRAFT Research Lab, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
Bruce Edmonds, Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK


Description:

Many academics consider qualitative evidence (e.g. texts gained from transcribing oral data or observations of people) and quantitative evidence to be incommensurable.  However, agent-based simulations are a possible vehicle for bridging this gap. Narrative textual evidence often gives clues as to the in-context behavior of individuals and is thus a natural source for behaviors to inform the specification of corresponding agent behavior within simulations. The texts will not give a complete picture, but will provide some of “menu” of behaviors people use. During this session we hope to further the understanding of how to improve this. We are particularly interested in accounts of the procedures or structures people used to bridge between qualitative and formal realms based in reported modelling experiences. Thus, those interested to present their work in this session have to make sure that their submission explicitly addresses the use of qualitative data in their modelling endeavour. The session is open to all approaches (full papers or extended abstracts; see details here<https://ssc2021.uek.krakow.pl/call-for-submissions/>) that seek to move from qualitative evidence towards a simulation in a systematic way. These include, but are not limited to:



* Approaches based in Grounded Theory.
* Tools for facilitating such a process.
* Participatory processes that result in a simulation.
* Frameworks for aiding the analysis of text into rules.
* Elicitation techniques that would aid the capture of information in an appropriate structure.
* Models and ideas from psychology to aid in the above process.
* Insights and tools from Natural Language Processing that may help this process.
* Agent architectures that will facilitate the programming of agents from such analyses.
* Philosophical or Sociological critiques, pointing out assumptions and dangers.
* Examples of where this approach has been tried.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cs.umbc.edu/pipermail/agents/attachments/20210331/1a59b336/attachment-0001.html>