[agents] 2nd CfP: 6th Enterprise Engineering Working Conference - Madeira Island - Portugal (EEWC 2016)
David Aveiro
programchair at ciaonetwork.org
Wed Jan 13 14:06:12 EST 2016
email_cfp
**Call for papers**
**6th Enterprise Engineering Working Conference (EEWC 2016)
**
May 30 - June 3, 2016 - Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal
Experience the benefits of a Working Conference, an Industry Track
and a Doctoral Consortium, in the Portuguese paradise known
as the Pearl of the Atlantic and winner of World Travel Awards
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0CDhoGAx1RCg>
of World's Leading Island Destination 2015
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0LDxoGAx1RCg>
and Europe’s
Leading Island Destination of 2014
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0LAhoGAx1RCg>
. Come
and visit us on a venue with breath taking views
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0CDxoGAx1RCg>
,
providing inspiration and conditions for an interesting program
with significant scientific advancement.
The EEWC 2016
will be the sixth working conference addressing the emerging
field of Enterprise Engineering, having as goal to gather academics and
practitioners in order to share innovative research issues and
practical experiences, and to facilitate profound discussions on the
issues put forward in the next sections of this Call for Papers.
Proceedings published in Springer Lecture Notes in Business
Information Processing
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0CBBoGAx1RCg>
(LNBIP).
Please distribute this Call for Papers among your colleagues, and/or
e-mail lists you belong to, that may be possibly interested in this
conference.
**Motivation**
Modern enterprises face a strong pressure to increase agility and
competitiveness, to operate on the global market, and to engage in
manifold alliances. However, many strategic initiatives in enterprises
fail, meaning that enterprises are unable to gain success from their
strategy. One of the identified reasons for such failures is the lack
of coherence and consistency among the various components of an
enterprise. At the same time, the need to operate as a unified and
integrated whole is becoming increasingly important. Currently, these
challenges are dominantly addressed from a functional or managerial
perspective, as advocated by the management and organization sciences,
and as implemented by traditional programs in business schools. Such
knowledge is indeed necessary for managing an enterprise, but it is
insufficient for bringing about changes in a fully systematic and
integrated way. To do that, one needs to take a constructional or
engineering perspective.
In addition, both organizations and software applications are complex
systems, prone to entropy. This means that in the course of time, the
costs of bringing about similar changes increase in a way that is known
as combinatorial explosion. Entropy can be reduced and managed
effectively through modular design based on atomic elements.
Lastly, the individual persons in an enterprise, in cooperation, are
ultimately responsible for the effective and efficient operation of the
enterprise. They are also collectively responsible for the evolution of
the enterprise, in order to meet new challenges. We believe these
responsibilities can be borne in a much more effective way if members
have an appropriate knowledge and an effective awareness of the
enterprise given by a sound engineering approach put forward by a
full-fledged scientific discipline.
**Mission**
The CIAO! Enterprise Engineering Network (CEEN) is a community of
academics and practitioners who strive to contribute to the development
of the discipline of Enterprise Engineering (EE), and to apply it in
practice. The aim is to develop a holistic and general systems theory
based understanding on how to (re)design and run enterprises
effectively.
The ambition is to develop a consistent and coherent set of theories,
models and associated methods that: enable enterprises to reflect, in a
systematic way, on how to realize improvements; and assist them, in
practice, in achieving their aspirations.
In doing so, sound empirical and scientific foundations should underlie
all efforts and all organisational aspects that are relevant should be
considered, while combining already existing knowledge from the
scientific fields of information systems, software engineering,
management, as well as philosophy, semiotics and sociology, among
others.
In other words, the (re)design of an enterprise and the subsequent
implementation of changes should be the consequence of rationalised
decisions that: take in account the nature and reality of the
enterprise and its environment; and respect relevant empirical and
scientific principles.
Enterprises are taken to be systems whose reality has a dual nature by
being simultaneously, on one hand, centrally and purposefully
(re)designed; and, on the other hand, emergent in a distributed way,
given the fact that, its main agents, the humans that are the ‘pearls’
of the organization, act with free will, in a creative and in a
responsible (or sometimes not) way.
We acknowledge that, in practice, the development of enterprises is not
always a purely rational/evidence-based process. As such, we believe
the field of EE aims to provide evidence-based insights into the design
and evolution of enterprises and the consequences of different choices
irrespective of the way decisions are made.
The origin of the scientific foundations of our present body of
knowledge is the CIAO! Paradigm (Communication, Information, Action,
Organisation) as expressed in the Enterprise
Engineering Manifesto
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0CBRoGAx1RCg>
and the paper: The
Discipline of Enterprise Engineering
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0LAxoGAx1RCg>
. In this paradigm,
organisation is considered to emerge in human communication, through
the intermediate roles of information and action. Based on the CIAO!
Paradigm, several theories have been developed, and still are being
proposed. They are published as technical reports
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0LABoGAx1RCg>
.
The CEEN welcomes proposals of improvements to our current body of
knowledge, as well as the inclusion of compliant and alternative views,
always keeping in mind the need to maintain global systemic coherence,
consistency and scientific rigour of the entire EE body of knowledge,
as a prerequisite for the consolidation of this new engineering
discipline. Yearly events
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0LARoGAx1RCg>
like the Enterprise Engineering Working Conference and associated
Doctoral Consortium are organized to promote the presentation of EE
research and application in practice, as well as discussions on the
contents and current state of our body of theories and methods.
**Topics**
Topics of interest to this working conference include, but are not
limited to:
Business Process Management
Business Process Modeling and Simulation
Business Rules
Business Rules Management
Collaborative, Participatory, and Interactive Modeling
Component-Based System Development
Domain Ontologies
Domain Reference Ontologies
Enterprise Architecture
Enterprise Design and Implementation
Enterprise Governance
Enterprise Modeling and Simulation
Enterprise Ontology
Information System Architectures
Information System Ontologies
Information Systems Design
Information Systems Development
Modeling (cross-enterprise) Business Processes
Ontology Implementation
Reference Models for (cross-enterprise) Business Processes
Service Oriented Architecture
Service Oriented Design
**Publication**
The EEWC proceedings will be published in the Springer LNBIP series:
“Lecture
Notes in Business Information Processing
<http://ciaonetwork.org/phplist/lt.php?id=YU0CBBoGAx1RCg>
“.
**Submission**
We are looking for papers on current or recently finished
research initiatives/projects as well as papers from
practitioners. Based on our motivating experience of the previous
working conferences, the 6th EEWC is planned to be a real working
conference, providing ample time for profound discussions following the
paper presentations. Namely, a 40 minutes slot is normally reserved for
each paper.
Papers should be submitted in PDF format. The results described must
be unpublished and must not be under review elsewhere. Submissions must
conform to Springer’s LNBIP format and should not exceed 15 pages,
including all text, figures, references and appendices. Submissions not
conforming to the LNBIP format or exceeding 15 pages will be rejected
without review. Information about the Springer LNBIP format can be
found at Springer LNBIP web page mentioned above. Three to five
keywords characterizing the paper should be indicated at the end of the
abstract.
For submissions please go to our Easychair conference web page and sign-up
or sign-in, submit your abstract and
upload your paper taking in account the dates specified below.
Important note: Since the review process is double-blind, please make
sure that your names and affiliations are not listed in the paper
submitted for review!
**Important Dates**
Abstract submission:
February 6, 2016
(not mandatory)
Paper submission:
February 24, 2016
Acceptance notification:
March 13, 2016
Camera ready:
March 26, 2016
EEWC Main program:
May 30 - June 1, 2016
EEWC Ciao! Research Discussion Sessions:
June 2 and 3, 2016
Complementary touristic activities:
May 29 and June 4 , 2016
**Chairs**
**Advisory Board **
Antonia Albani, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Jan L.G. Dietz, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
**Conference Chair**
Jorge Sanz, IBM Research at Almaden, California US
**Program co-Chairs**
David Aveiro, University of Madeira, Portugal
Robert Pergl, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
Antonia Albani, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
**Organization co-Chairs**
David Aveiro, University of Madeira, Portugal
Duarte Gouveia, University of Madeira, Portugal
**Program Committee (to be
updated)**
Bernhard Bauer
University of Augsburg, Germany
Carlos Páscoa
Portuguese Air Force Academy, Portugal
Christian Huemer
Vienna University of Technology, Austria
Duarte Gouveia
University of Madeira, Portugal
Eduard Babkin
Higher School of Economics, Nizhny Novgorod,
Russia
Eric Dubois
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology,
Luxembourg
Erik Proper
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology,
Luxembourg
Florian Matthes
Technical University Munich, Germany
Frank Harmsen
Maastricht University and Ernst & Young
Advisory
Geert Poels
University of Gent, Belgium
Gil Regev
École Polytechnique
Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
Graham McLeod
University of Cape Town, South Africa
Hans Mulder
University of Antwerp, Belgium
Jan Hoogervorst
Sogeti Netherlands, The Netherlands
Jan Verelst
University of Antwerp, Belgium
Jens Gulden
University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
João Pombinho
University of Lisbon, Portugal
Johann Eder
University of Klagenfurt, Austria
Joop de Jong
Mprise, The Netherlands
José Tribolet
INESC and University of Lisbon, Portugal
Junichi Iijima
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
Khaled Gaaloul
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology,
Luxembourg
Marcello Bax
Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Maurício Almeida
Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Miguel Mira da Silva
INESC and University of Lisbon, Portugal
Niek Pluijmert
INQA Quality Consultants, The Netherlands
Nuno Castela
Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, Portugal
Olga Oshmarina
Higher School of Economics, Nizhny Novgorod,
Russia
Paul Johanesson
Stockholm University, Sweden
Peter Loos
University of Saarland, Germany
Philip Huysmans
University of Antwerp, Belgium
Robert Lagerström
KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
Rony Flatscher
Vienna University of Economics and Business
Administration, Austria
Sanetake Nagayoshi
Waseda University, Japan
Sérgio Guerreiro
Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal
Steven van Kervel
Formetis, The Netherlands
Stijn Hoppenbrouwers
HAN University of Applied Sciences
Sybren de Kinderen
University of Luxembourg
Ulrich Frank
University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Ulrik Franke
Swedish Defense Research Agency, Sweden
-- powered by phpList, www.phplist.com --
More information about the agents
mailing list